Evaluation of the synergistic effect of eravacycline and tigecycline against carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) poses a substantial healthcare challenge. This study assessed the in vitro efficacy of selected antibiotic combinations against CRKP infections. METHODS: Our research involved the evaluation of 40 clinical isolates of CRKP, with half expressing Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) and half producing Metallo-ß-lactamase (MBL), two key enzymes contributing to carbapenem resistance. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of four antibiotics: eravacycline, tigecycline, polymyxin-B, and ceftazidime/avibactam. Synergistic interactions between these antibiotic combinations were examined using checkerboard and time-kill analyses. RESULTS: We noted significant differences in the MICs of ceftazidime/avibactam between KPC and MBL isolates. Checkerboard analysis revealed appreciable synergy between combinations of tigecycline (35%) or eravacycline (40%) with polymyxin-B. The synergy rates for the combination of tigecycline or eravacycline with polymyxin-B were similar among the KPC and MBL isolates. These combinations maintained a synergy rate of 70.6% even against polymyxin-B resistant isolates. In contrast, combinations of tigecycline (5%) or eravacycline (10%) with ceftazidime/avibactam showed significantly lower synergy than combinations with polymyxin-B (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). Among the MBL CRKP isolates, only one exhibited synergy with eravacycline or tigecycline and ceftazidime/avibactam combinations, and no synergistic activity was identified in the time-kill analysis for these combinations. The combination of eravacycline and polymyxin-B demonstrated the most promising synergy in the time-kill analysis. CONCLUSION: This study provides substantial evidence of a significant synergy when combining tigecycline or eravacycline with polymyxin-B against CRKP strains, including those producing MBL. These results highlight potential therapeutic strategies against CRKP infections.

The pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of ceftazidime/avibactam for central nervous system infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negatives: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of ceftazidime/avibactam in critically ill patients with CNS infections. METHODS: A prospective study of critically ill patients with CNS infections who were treated with ceftazidime/avibactam and the steady-state concentration (Css) of ceftazidime/avibactam in serum and/or CSF was conducted between August 2020 and May 2023. The relationship between PK/PD goal achievement, microbial eradication and the clinical efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam was evaluated. RESULTS: Seven patients were finally included. The ceftazidime/avibactam target attainment in plasma was optimal for three, quasi-optimal for one and suboptimal for three. In three patients with CSF drug concentrations measured, ceftazidime/avibactam target attainment in CSF was 100% (3/3), which was optimal. The AUCCSF/serum values were 0.59, 0.44 and 0.35 for ceftazidime and 0.57, 0.53 and 0.51 for avibactam. Of the seven patients, 100% (7/7) were treated effectively, 71.4% (5/7) achieved microbiological eradication, 85.7% (6/7) survived and 14.3% (1/7) did not survive. CONCLUSIONS: The limited clinical data suggest that ceftazidime/avibactam is effective in the treatment of CNS infections caused by MDR Gram-negative bacilli (MDR-GNB), can achieve the ideal drug concentration of CSF, and has good blood-brain barrier penetration.

High ceftazidime-avibactam resistance among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter species: Data from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) programme, 2014-2021.

OBJECTIVES: Trends in the susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and tigecycline (TGC) among Enterobacter species from different geographic areas are unknown.This study aimed to analyse the trends in CZA and TGC susceptibility changes across different continents from 2014 to 2021 utilizing Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) data. METHODS: A total of 23 669 isolates of Enterobacter species were collected over an 8-y period. RESULTS: The overall non-susceptibility rate of Enterobacter isolates to both CZA and TGC was 3.2%. India (16.5%), Guatemala (15.4%), and the Philippines (13.1%) exhibited the highest resistance to CZA. The increase in CZA resistance rates was particularly evident in Asia, with an increase from 4.0% to 8.3%, and in Latin America, from 1.5% to 5%. The non-susceptibility rate for TGC mildly increased in Africa/Middle East but decreased in other continents during the study period. The overall rate of carbapenem resistance increased from 2.9% in 2014-2017 to 4.3% in 2018-2021. Among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter isolates, the CZA resistance rate was highest in Asia (87.4%), followed by Europe (69.2%) and Africa/Middle East (60.8%). Among the 380 Enterobacter isolates resistant to CZA and carbapenem, the most common genotype of carbapenemase genes was blaNDM (59.2%), followed by blaVIM (24.2%), blaOXA (4.2%), blaIMP (1.1%), and blaKPC (1.1%). The susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter to TGC remained high, with an overall susceptibility rate of 90%. CONCLUSIONS: The heterogeneous distribution of CZA resistance rates among different geographical regions highlights the divergent therapeutic options for drug-resistant Enterobacter species.

Intraperitoneal vancomycin plus levofloxacin for the treatment of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis in patients with no response to cefazolin plus ceftazidime.

INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis (PDRP) should be treated as soon as possible by an empirical regimen without waiting for effluent bacterial culture results. We retrospectively investigated patients treated with vancomycin plus levofloxacin as a treatment regimen if there was no response to cefazolin plus ceftazidime. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected records of adult patients with PDRP from January 1, 2013, to November 30, 2020. The characteristics of episodes of PDRP with no response to cefazolin plus ceftazidime treated by intraperitoneal (IP) injection of vancomycin plus levofloxacin were analyzed. RESULTS: 118 episodes of PDRP were recorded, among which 115 episodes were treated with IP antibiotics. 93 episodes were treated with cefazolin plus ceftazidime. In 38 episodes, treatment was switched to IP injection of vancomycin plus levofloxacin if there was no response to cefazolin plus ceftazidime. 26/38 (68.4%) episodes were cured by vancomycin plus levofloxacin. Fever, diabetes, fasting glucose, a decrease in effluent leukocytes on day 3 and day 5, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores were significantly different between uncured and cured episodes. No variable was associated with treatment failure after multiple logistic regression. Fever, diabetes, a decrease in effluent leukocytes on day 3, and CCI score were associated with treatment failure after univariable logistic regression. CONCLUSION: Vancomycin plus levofloxacin may be effective if patients are not responsive to cefazolin plus ceftazidime.

Evaluation of the MTS™ aztreonam-avibactam strip (Liofilchem) on New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales.

The combination of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and aztreonam (ATM) is used to treat MBL-producing Enterobacterales-related infections. The new combination aztreonam-avibactam (AZA) is currently in development. We compared results obtained with the new MIC test strip (MTS) AZA (Liofilchem) with broth microdilution method (BMD) on 41 MBL-producing Enterobacterales from 41 clinical samples. The MTS AZA was also compared to combination testing method using CAZ-AVI and ATM strips. Compared to BMD, categorical agreement (CA) was 100%. Compared with combination testing method, CA was 97.6%. The MTS AZA can be used to determine MICs levels of AZA or CAZ-AVI/ATM combinations.

Rapid characterization of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales by multiplex lateral flow assay and detection of ceftazidime-avibactam-aztreonam synergy.

PURPOSE: The choice of antibiotics for treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) is increasing becoming limited due to co-expression of Metallo-beta-lactamases (MBL) along with other carbapenemases in these isolates. The study aimed to investigate the occurrence of CRE and to determine the in-vitro synergy and clinical outcomes of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam combination in CRE infections in adult Intensive Care Units (ICUs). METHODS: 79 CRE isolates recovered from adult ICUs during January to March 2023 were tested by O.K.N.V.I. RESIST-5, a lateral flow multiplex assay for rapid detection of OXA-48-like, NDM, IMP, VIM, and KPC carbapenemases. Ceftazidime-Avibactam MIC was determined by microbroth dilution method and in vitro synergy between Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam was assessed by Modified E-test/disc diffusion method for these isolates. RESULTS: The study revealed 7.5 % occurrence of CRE in our hospital, with high occurrence of NDM (n = 42, 53.1 %) and OXA-48-like (n = 63, 79.7 %) carbapenemase. Production of more than one type of carbapenemases was found in 44 isolates. A total of 57 isolates (72 %) had Ceftazidime-Avibactam resistance and 44 of them displayed Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam in-vitro synergy. Successful clinical outcome was observed in two patients who received Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam combination therapy for 7 days or more. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the preponderance of Ceftazidime-Avibactam resistant CRE expressing NDM and OXA-48-like carbapenemase in our hospital, 77.2 % of them displayed in-vitro synergy of Ceftazidime-Avibactam with Aztreonam. It emphasizes the potential therapeutic utility of this combination in CRE strains showing coproduction of MBL and serine carbapenemases. Greater therapeutic potential of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam combination was observed with extended duration of therapy. However, further clinical evidence is needed to establish the efficacy of this combination and consider other factors that influence treatment outcomes.

Effectiveness and safety of cefotaxime combined with avibactam for treating multidrug-resistant E coli infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli infections are a global health challenge, notably in North America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness and safety of cefotaxime combined with avibactam, aiming to mitigate these infections' impact and lessen their burden on healthcare systems worldwide. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and PICO frameworks, we conducted a comprehensive literature search across 4 primary databases on May 6, 2023. Studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of cefotaxime and avibactam were included. Key outcomes included treatment success, adverse effects, and microbiological eradication. Quality assessment utilized the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias instrument. Heterogeneity was analyzed using chi-square statistics and the I2 index. Both fixed- and random-effects models were applied as appropriate. Publication bias was rigorously evaluated using Egger linear regression test and funnel plot analysis, ensuring the study's integrity and reliability. RESULTS: The clinical cure rate derived from 8 studies showed no significant difference between the treatment groups (odds ratio [OR] = 1.97, 95% CI: 0.69 to 1.36, P = .86). Analysis of the bacterial clearance rate from the 5 studies also indicated no significant difference (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.42 to 2.25, P = .36). Notably, a reduced mortality rate favoring the experimental group was observed in 6 studies (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.92, P = .012). Comprehensive sensitivity analyses and the assessment of publication bias strengthened the reliability of the results. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftazidime combined with avibactam significantly reduced mortality among patients with multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli infections, indicating its potential as a therapeutic option, especially for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. However, extensive large-scale clinical trials are required to validate these findings.

Concomitant Resistance to Cefiderocol and Ceftazidime/Avibactam in Two Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates from Two Lung Transplant Patients.

In this study, we present two cases of Klebsiella pneumoniae, one KPC-33- and one NDM-1-producing, showing resistance to cefiderocol and ceftazidime/avibactam, collected in the intensive care unit of a hospital in Northern Italy from two patients who had recently undergone lung transplantation. Whole-genome sequencing was performed to investigate the molecular features of these strains.

Clinical efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam combination therapy for severe hospital-acquired pulmonary infections caused by carbapenem-resistant and difficult-to-treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study aimed to identify the effectiveness of ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) and its optimisation programs for severe hospital-acquired pulmonary infections (sHAPi) caused by carbapenem-resistant and difficult-to-treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA and DTR-P. aeruginosa). METHODS: We retrospectively analysed observational data on treatment and outcomes of CAZ/AVI for sHAPi caused by CRPA or DTR-P. aeruginosa. The primary study outcomes were to evaluate the clinical and microbiology efficacy of CAZ/AVI. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 84 in-patients with sHAPi caused by CRPA (n = 39) and DTR-P. aeruginosa (n = 45) who received at least 72 h of CAZ/AVI therapy. The clinical cure rate was 63.1% in total. There was no significant difference in study outcomes between patients treated with CAZ/AVI monotherapy and those managed with combination regimens. CAZ/AVI as first-line therapy possessed prominent clinical benefits regarding infections caused by DTR-P. aeruginosa. The clinical cure rate was positively relevant with loading dose for CAZ/AVI (odds ratio [OR] 0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.004-0.19; P < 0.001) and with CAZ/AVI administration by prolonged infusion (odds ratio 0.15; 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.77; P = 0.002). APACHE II score>15 (P = 0.013), septic shock at infection onset (P = 0.001), and CAZ/AVI dose adjustment for renal dysfunction (P = 0.003) were negative predictors of clinical cure. CONCLUSION: CAZ/AVI is a valid alternative for sHAPi caused by CPRA and DTR-P. aeruginosa, even when used alone. Optimisations of the treatment with CAZ/AVI in critically ill patients, including loading dose, adequate maintenance dose and prolonged infusion, were positively associated with potential clinical benefits.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of ceftazidime/avibactam and fosfomycin combinations in an in vitro hollow fiber infection model against multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli.

IMPORTANCE: Mechanistic understanding of pharmacodynamic interactions is key for the development of rational antibiotic combination therapies to increase efficacy and suppress the development of resistances. Potent tools to provide those insights into pharmacodynamic drug interactions are semi-mechanistic modeling and simulation techniques. This study uses those techniques to provide a detailed understanding with regard to the direction and strength of the synergy of ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftazidime-fosfomycin in a clinical Escherichia coli isolate expressing extended spectrum beta-lactamase (CTX-M-15 and TEM-4) and carbapenemase (OXA-244) genes. Enhanced killing effects in combination were identified as a driver of the synergy and were translated from static time-kill experiments into the dynamic hollow fiber infection model. These findings in combination with a suppression of the emergence of resistance in combination emphasize a potential clinical benefit with regard to increased efficacy or to allow for dose reductions with maintained effect sizes to avoid toxicity.

Emergence of cefiderocol resistance during ceftazidime/avibactam treatment caused by a large genomic deletion, including ampD and piuCD genes, in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

We report the emergence of cefiderocol resistance during the treatment of a ST312 Pseudomonas aeruginosa respiratory infection with ceftazidime/avibactam. whole genome sequencing (WGS) revealed that resistance was caused by a large genomic deletion, including PiuDC (iron transport system) and AmpD (ampC negative regulator), driven by the integration of phage DNA. Thus, our findings alert that this type of deletion could be an efficient (two mechanisms in one step) specific cefiderocol resistance mechanism that might occur nonspecifically upon treatment with ß-lactams that select for AmpC overexpression.

Moving towards a standardized definition of antimicrobial resistance: a comparison of the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) versus multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates (CANWARD, 2016-2021).

Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates demonstrating difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) and multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotypes were evaluated by broth microdilution. Susceptibility was lower for all antimicrobials versus DTR relative to MDR isolates. Ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and imipenem-relebactam susceptibility was 35.9%, 64.5%, and 47.0% for DTR isolates and 60.5%, 80.6%, and 71.5% for MDR isolates.

Ceftazidime-avibactam versus polymyxins in treating patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) pose a significant threat to human health and have emerged as a major public health concern. We aimed to compare the efficacy and the safety of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and polymyxin in the treatment of CRE infections. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching the databases of EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. Published studies on the use of CAZ-AVI and polymyxin in the treatment of CRE infections were collected from the inception of the database until March 2023. Two investigators independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies and extracted the data. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. RESULTS: Ten articles with 833 patients were included (CAZ-AVI 325 patients vs Polymyxin 508 patients). Compared with the patients who received polymyxin-based therapy, the patients who received CAZ-AVI therapy had significantly lower 30-days mortality (RR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.01-2.34; I2 = 22%; P < 0.00001), higher clinical cure rate (RR = 2.70; 95% CI 1.67-4.38; I2 = 40%; P < 0.00001), and higher microbial clearance rate (RR = 2.70; 95% CI 2.09-3.49; I2 = 0%; P < 0.00001). However, there was no statistically difference in the incidence of acute kidney injury between patients who received CAZ-AVI and polymyxin therapy (RR = 1.38; 95% CI 0.69-2.77; I2 = 22%; P = 0.36). In addition, among patients with CRE bloodstream infection, those who received CAZ-AVI therapy had significantly lower mortality than those who received polymyxin therapy (RR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.27-0.69, I2 = 26%, P < 0.00004). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to polymyxin, CAZ-AVI demonstrated superior clinical efficacy in the treatment of CRE infections, suggesting that CAZ-AVI may be a superior option for CRE infections.

Prevalence and mortality of ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections (2018-2022).

INTRODUCTION: Ceftazidime/avibactam-resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) is a topic of great interest for epidemiological, diagnostic, and therapeutical reasons. However, data on its prevalence and burden on mortality in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) are lacking. This study was aimed at identifying risk factors for mortality in patients suffering from ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp BSI. METHODS: An observational retrospective study (January 2018-December 2022) was conducted at a tertiary hospital including all consecutive hospitalized adult patients with a ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp BSI. Data on baseline clinical features, management, and admission outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Over the study period, among all the KPC-Kp BSI events recorded, 38 (10.5%) were caused by ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp strains, 37 events being finally included. The ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp strains revealed susceptibility restoration to at least one carbapenem in more than 60% of cases. In-hospital and 30-day all-cause mortality rates were 22% and 16.2%, respectively. Non-survivors suffered from more baseline comorbidities and experienced a more severe ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp BSI presentation (i.e., both the Pitt Bacteremia and INCREMENT-CPE scores were significantly higher). Presenting with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, chronic kidney disease-KDIGO stage 3A or worse-having recently gone through renal replacement therapy, having suffered from an acute kidney injury following the ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp BSI, and being admitted for cardiac surgery were the strongest predictors of mortality. CONCLUSION: Ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in KPC-Kp BSI easily emerged in our highly KPC-Kp endemic area with remarkable mortality rates. Our findings might provide physicians possibly actionable information when managing patients with a ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp BSI.

Azithromycin regulates bacterial virulence and immune response in a murine model of ceftazidime-treated Pseudomonas aeruginosa acute pneumonia.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) remains one of the leading causes of nosocomial acute pneumonia. The array of virulence factors expressed by PA and the intense immune response associated with PA pneumonia play a major role in the severity of these infections. New therapeutic approaches are needed to overcome the high resistance of PA to antibiotics and to reduce the direct damage to host tissues. Through its immunomodulatory and anti-virulence effects, azithromycin (AZM) has demonstrated clinical benefits in patients with chronic PA respiratory infections. However, there is relatively little evidence in PA acute pneumonia. We investigated the effects of AZM, as an adjunctive therapy combined with ceftazidime (CAZ), in a murine model of PA acute pneumonia. We observed that the combined therapy (i) reduces the weight loss of mice 24 h post-infection (hpi), (ii) decreases neutrophil influx into the lungs at 6 and 24 hpi, while this effect is absent in a LPS-induced pneumonia or when PA is pretreated with antibiotics and mice do not receive any antibiotics, and that (iii) AZM, alone or with CAZ, modulates the expression of PA quorum sensing regulators and virulence factors (LasI, LasA, PqsE, PhzM, ExoS). Our findings support beneficial effects of AZM with CAZ on PA acute pneumonia by both bacterial virulence and immune response modulations. Further investigations are needed to clarify the exact underlying mechanisms responsible for the reduction of the neutrophils influx and to better discriminate between direct immunomodulatory properties of AZM, and indirect effects on neutrophilia resulting from bacterial virulence modulation.

Clinical outcomes of intensive care unit patients infected with multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria treated with ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam.

In intensive care units (ICUs), infection rates range from 18 to 54%, which is five to ten times higher than those observed in other hospital units, with a mortality rate of 9% to 60%. In recent decades, the susceptibility pattern has changed and Gram-Negative Bacteria (GNB) have become a threat due to their high frequency of multidrug resistance associated with a scarcity of therapeutic options. However, the drugs Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T) and Ceftazidime/Avibactam (C/A) are demonstrating good clinical and microbiological response in the treatment of severe nosocomial infections. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with severe infections caused by Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) GNB treated with C/T and C/A. Our study evaluates a total of 131 patients who received treatment with C/T and C/A due to infections caused by MDR GNB within the period from 2018 to 2021. The main infections were urinary tract (46,6%) and respiratory (26,7%) infections. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the prevailing agent in the sample evaluation (34.3%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (30,1%). About 54,9% of patients showed a favorable response, with culture negativation in 66,4% of the samples, with no discrepancy in negativations when comparing ages: 67,7% in young and 66% in elderly patients. Among the patients, 62,6% received monotherapy with C/T and C/A with a better response observed with monotherapy compared to combination therapy (58,6% vs 41,4%). The overall mortality rate was 45%, with MDR GNB infections responsible for 33,9% of these deaths, and the others (66,1%) due to factors such as oncological, hematological, and degenerative neurological diseases. In regards to hematological aspect, 35,1% of patients showed changes, with 28,2% of them presenting anemia, 4,5% thrombocytopenia, and 2,5% thrombocytosis. Concerning the use of invasive devices, higher mortality was observed in patients on mechanical ventilation (52%). In this manner, it was possible to observe that therapy with C/T and C/A yielded a favorable clinical outcome in patients with severe infections caused by MDR GNB in the study. These drugs also demonstrated good tolerability regardless of age or the presence of preexisting comorbidities and were deemed safe when assessing adverse effects. Our data also demonstrate the importance of determining the mechanism of resistance to carbapenems so that these drugs can be used more effectively and rationally.

AGGREGATIBACTER ENDOPHTHALMITIS IN A PATIENT WITH DENTOPHOBIA.

PURPOSE: To describe a rare case of unilateral, endogenous endophthalmitis caused by Aggregatibacter aphrophilus (HACEK group) confirmed in vitreous and blood cultures, in a patient with dentophobia. METHODS: Case report. PATIENTS: A seventy-five-year-old male patient with Type 2 diabetes, previous myocardial infarction, and pacemaker implantation. RESULTS: Patient was observed with sudden loss of vision at the Department of Ophthalmology, Uppsala University. Initial diagnosis was posterior vitreous detachment and anterior uveitis, but progression of disease led to vitrectomy, which actually demonstrated endophthalmitis and growth of A. aphrophilus of the HACEK group. Aggregatibacter bacteremia and pacemaker endocarditis were also identified and dental examination confirmed growth of Aggregatibacter in the oral cavity. Intravitreal treatment with ceftazidime and vancomycin according to Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study protocol was administered with quick resolution of endophthalmitis. CONCLUSION: Aggregatibacter endophthalmitis is a rare, but devastating cause of vision loss where immediate diagnosis may be delayed. Prompt diagnosis may be facilitated by a thorough medical history and early vitreous biopsy. Systemic investigation by an infectious disease specialist and multidisciplinary assessment are mandatory. Ophthalmologic treatment is effective with intravitreal injections of ceftazidime and vancomycin.

A descriptive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of ceftazidime-avibactam in a case series of critically ill patients with augmented renal clearance.

To describe the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of a 2 h infusion of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) in critically ill patients with augmented renal clearance (ARC). A retrospective review of all critically ill patients with ARC who were treated with CAZ-AVI between August 2020 and May 2023 was conducted. Patients whose 12-h creatinine clearance prior to CAZ-AVI treatment and steady-state concentration (Css) of CAZ-AVI were both monitored were enrolled. The free fraction (fCss) of CAZ-AVI was calculated from Css. The joint PK/PD targets of CAZ-AVI were considered optimal when a Css/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio for CAZ ≥4 (equivalent to 100% fT > 4 MIC) and a Css/CT ratio of AVI >1 (equivalent to 100% fT > CT 4.0 mg/L) were reached simultaneously, quasioptimal when only one of the two targets was reached, and suboptimal when neither target was reached. The relationship between PK/PD goal achievement, microbial eradication and the clinical efficacy of CAZ-AVI was evaluated. Four patients were included. Only one patient achieved optimal joint PK/PD targets, while the other three reached suboptimal targets. The patient with optimal PK/PD targets achieved microbiological eradication, while the other three patients did not, but all four patients achieved good clinical efficacy. Standard dosages may not enable most critically ill patients with ARC to reach the optimal joint PK/PD targets of CAZ-AVI. Optimal drug dose adjustment of CAZ-AVI in ARC patients requires dynamic drug concentration monitoring.

Pharmacokinetic analysis of ceftazidime and cefazolin in the treatment of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis.

OBJECTIVE: Peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis (PDRP) presents a significant challenge for nephrologists. Continuous intraperitoneal cefazolin and ceftazidime are recommended for the treatment of peritonitis. However, some pharmacokinetic studies have shown that doses of 15-20 mg/kg/d may not achieve sufficient therapeutic levels. In this study, we investigated the pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime and cefazolin in patients with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis and compared the pharmacokinetic characteristics between traditional and modified treatment groups. METHODS: From February 2017 to December 2019, 42 PDRP patients (17 males, 25 females; mean age: 50.7 ± 12.1 years; mean body weight: 60.9 ± 11.8 kg) were recruited for the study, all participants were anuric. Twenty patients were enrolled in the traditional group and treated with cefazolin (1.0 g) and ceftazidime (1.0 g) via intraperitoneal administration once daily for 14 days. Twenty-two patients were enrolled in the modified group and received the same dose of antibiotics twice daily for the initial five days, followed by once daily for the subsequent nine days. Serum and dialysate samples were collected after days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14 and analyzed via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: In the traditional group, the highest and lowest serum concentrations of ceftazidime were 35.9 and 21.7 µg/mL, respectively. The highest concentration of cefazolin was 54.6 µg/mL on day 5 and the lowest concentration was 30.4 µg/mL on day 1. In the modified group, the highest and lowest serum concentrations of ceftazidime were 102.2 and 54.8 µg/mL, respectively. The highest concentration of cefazolin was 141.7 µg/mL and the lowest concentration was 79.8 µg/mL. All antibiotic concentrations were above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) level (8 µg/mL of ceftazidime and 2 µg/mL of cefazolin) throughout the treatment period. However, on day 1, the concentration of ceftazidime in the third bag of dialysate effluent from the traditional group fell below the MIC level. Despite remaining above the MIC, cefazolin concentration was consistently lower in the third bag of dialysate effluent from the traditional group throughout the treatment period. CONCLUSIONS: Intraperitoneal administration of cefazolin and ceftazidime at a dose of 1 g twice daily for 5 days and then once daily for the rest of the treatment period ensured adequate therapeutic levels of antibiotics for treating anuric PDRP patients.